Foiled Again
July 29th, 2009

Foiled Again

^ 14 Comments...

  1. Noah

    When I was in pre-calculus, there was a 10-Day Pre-Cal syllabus. One of the days was, “Show them the video of the student factoring x^2 + y^2 = (x+y)^2 and getting HIT BY A TRAIN” so that made me laugh a lot!

  2. Jim Vaught

    Alas! Would that the world were a commutative ring of characteristic 2…

  3. Harald Schilly

    But my computer says:

    sage: R. = GF(2)[]
    sage: (x+y)^2
    x^2 + y^2

    ;)

  4. Sylvia S.

    Okay, this comic goes on my office door. (Of course, that is why Z_2 is so nice.)

  5. Sylvia S.

    Oh, I just saw Jim Vaught’s comment. He already got the commutative ring of characteristic 2. Foiled again.

  6. foofoo

    mod 2 and it works fine

  7. John

    We call this the freshman dream.

  8. Invisibules

    I only came here to suggest trying it in Z_2, but since you beat me to it, I could point out that it also works in Z_1 …

  9. 31459265

    Another one: anticommutative rings!

  10. Ethan

    It works for boolean algebra too, though admittedly I’ve never seen exponents used to represent iterated AND gates. That would be a seriously cute notational convention.

  11. Patrick

    I’m a math tutor at a college campus…I’m definitely going to hang this up in the room. Printed out very large.

  12. Kevin

    Doesn’t every equation work in Z_1?

  13. Nancy

    well
    this is funny….but also stupid mistake

  14. Maxtwo

    It works in any Z_p. (x+y)^p == x^p+y^p (p)

) Your Reply...